Tutti i forum  katalogando.com  Guide all'utilizzo  Giants Brian Daboll explains why punting

Nota: Devi essere registrato per rispondere al messaggio.
Per registrarti, premi qui. La registrazione è GRATUITA!

Risoluzione schermo: 640 x 480 800 x 600 1024 x 768 1280 x 1024 Nome utente: Password: Modo formattazione: Base  Help  Prompt  Formato: Carattere Andale Mono Arial Arial Black Book Antiqua Century Gothic Comic Sans MS Courier New Georgia Impact Lucida Console Script MT Bold Stencil Tahoma Times New Roman Trebuchet MS Verdana   Size 1 2 3 4 5 6   Colore Nero Rosso Giallo Rosa Verde Arancione Porpora Blu Beige Marrone Teal Blu scuro Castano Verde lime Messaggio: * HTML non è attivo * Il codice su forum è attivo Smiles [quote][i]Inviato in origine da lovelystyle[/i] [br]The Giants tied for the first time since the 1997 season in their 20-all Week 13 game against the Commanders, and Brian Daboll was left explaining himself after the game.Daboll made a controversial call in overtime when the Giants were facing a fourth- https://www.promapleleafs.com/nazem-kadri-kids-jersey and-3 on Washington's with 1:42 left in the game.Many presumed that New York would go for it. After all, the Giants were so close to scoring range and time was running low in the contest.However, Daboll instead tried to draw the Commanders offside. When that failed, he decided to punt.MORE: Why didn't Daboll take a chance and try to convert the fourth-and-3? He explained in it was all about the faith he had in his defense."I thought our defense had a chance to keep them down there," Daboll explained. "Maybe we'll get the ball back with, call it, 35 seconds somewhere around there, somewhere around https://www.promapleleafs.com/tyson-barrie-men-jersey midfield, and give ourselves another chance. If you don't get it, then they kick a field goal, and they were going with the wind. So, that's a decision that I made."Daboll noted that giving the defense a larger field with which to work played a big role in his decision. He wanted to force Washington to have to work its way down a full field instead of needing just 15 yards to get into field goal range.Plus, having the Commanders backed up was an added bonus. If the Giants could make a big play and get a turnover, they would have a chance to win the game.MORE:Daboll also https://www.promapleleafs.com/calvin-pickard-women-jersey acknowledged that the distance of the fourth down played a big role in his decision.Would it have been different if it was fourth-and-1 versus fourth-and-3? Potentially.So, I think those things come into play. But again, at fourth-and-3 after the play we just had before that and with two timeouts, that was the best thing to do.The decision actually worked out exactly in the way that Daboll drew it up. The Giants were able to get the ball back with 28 seconds on the clock, and they were able to set up Graham Gano for a 58 https://www.promapleleafs.com/wendel-clark-women-jersey -yard field goal attempt. The kick came up just short.GANO MISSES IT AND THE GIANTS AND COMMANDERS TIE Mr Matthew CFB (@MrMatthewCFB) So, while the call didn't quite get the Giants the win, Daboll explained that he still felt like that was the right choice."Look, https://www.promapleleafs.com/mitchell-marner-kids-jersey the decision that we made I'm good with it," he said. "I felt comfortable with it , and we went down, we almost ended up getting the ball out of them. Had a chance at the end. Could have had a little bit closer, but that's a decision based on where we were at on the field, the time of the game and the situation that we're in that we felt was best." [/quote]   Seleziona qui per inserire la tua firma.